|
|
Post by Paradoxymoron on Aug 18, 2010 17:35:02 GMT -8
So which do you think is the better style?
Poetry with rhyme, or those without?
Tell me your opinion about this. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Polaris on Aug 23, 2010 1:38:29 GMT -8
i appreciate rhyme but never end rhyme... there is what we call internal rhyme... some are gifted to create it naturally, some dont; but it doesnt mean that they cant practice it.. for me the redundancy of endrhyme renders the poem unsavory and un-aesthetic. honestly i find it painful(in a bad way) to read poems with overflowing end rhyme... there is what we call the "Katutubong metre and rhyme (nakalimutan ko tagalog words nun) there are words that doesnt end with the same leter but it rhymes when you say it or rather it rhymes because it has melody and is therefore musical
The line break doesnt break the rhyme it just emphasizes the word or the phrase by the way. a real poet will know when a poem has melody even if it has a ghastly form.
to me what really counts is the Aesthetic and the melody of it
|
|
|
|
Post by Vermeil Crescent on Aug 30, 2010 9:19:26 GMT -8
I think it depends on one's preferences or taste on which style appeals to him/her. I like the symmetrical rhythm of poems with rhyme. Specially those rhymes that come out naturally, creatively woven, & don't sound forced. At the same time, I like the freedom of unrhymed poems. I find something very artistic in them, specially those that smoothly connect the words & thoughts even if the rhythm is ever-changing. There seem to be no 'better' form, just better-written poems. I think. ^^
|
|
